GENERAL STANDARDS OF APPELLATE REVIEW

CHAPTER FOURTEEN

  • 14:1000 OVERVIEW
  • 14:1100 Fact-Identification, Law-Declaration, and Application of Law to Facts
  • 14:1110 Fact-Identification
  • 14:1111 The Several Facets of Fact Identification or Fact-Finding
  • 14:1112 “Weighing” Evidence
  • 14:1113 Drawing Inferences
  • 14:1120 Declaring the Law
  • 14:1121 Generally
  • 14:1122 Determination of a Standard as a Legal Norm
  • 14:1130 Application of the Law to the Facts
  • 14:2000 STANDARD OF REVIEW OF FINDINGS OF FACT: “PALPABLE AND OVERRIDING ERROR”.
  • 14:2100 Introduction
  • 14:2110 Standard Embraces Both Process and Substantive Fact-Finding Errors
  • 14:2120 Legislative Facts
  • 14:2200 Evolution of the Standard of “Palpable and Overriding Error”
  • 14:2210 Prior to “Kathy K”
  • 14:2220 Housen v. Nikolaisen
  • 14:2221 Deference to be Accorded to All Findings of Fact
  • 14:2222 Rationales for Deference
  • 14:2230 H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General)
  • 14:2240 Obviousness and Materiality of the Error
  • 14:2241 The Obviousness of the Error
  • 14:2242 The Materiality of the Error
  • 14:2300 Intervention with a Trial Judge’s Findings of Fact
  • 14:2310 Generally
  • 14:2320 Credibility Findings
  • 14:2321 Assessing Credibility
  • 14:2322 Standard of Appellate Review of Credibility Findings
  • 14:2323 Intervention in Credibility Findings
  • 14:2330 Expert Evidence
  • 14:2331 Function of Experts
  • 14:2332 Appellate Intervention
  • 14:3000 ERROR OF LAW
  • 14:3100 The Standard of Review: “Correctness”
  • 14:3110 Generally
  • 14:3120 Interpretation of Contracts
  • 14:3130 Particularizing a Standard
  • 14:4000 STANDARD OF REVIEW OF QUESTIONS OF MIXED FACT AND LAW
  • 14:4100 Overview
  • 14:4200 Selecting the Appropriate Standard of Review
  • 14:4210 Classifying as Questions of Fact or Questions of Law
  • 14:4211 Questions of Fact
  • 14:4212 Questions of Law
  • 14:4220 Establishing the Standard of Review in Light of Housen v. Nikolaisen
  • 14:4221 Extricating a Question of Law
  • 14:4222 Conclusion to Have Precedential Effect.
  • 14:5000 JURY VERDICTS
  • 14:5100 Overview
  • 14:5200 “No Evidence”
  • 14:5300 Review of a Jury’s Conclusions
  • 14:5310 The Standard of Review
  • 14:5311 The Classic Statement of the Standard
  • 14:5312 Alternative Descriptions of the Test
  • 14:6000 STANDARDS OF REVIEW APPLIED ON A SECOND APPEAL
  • 14:6100 Overview
  • 14:6200 Appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada
  • 14:6210 Concurrent Findings in the Courts Below
  • 14:6300 Standard of Review by a Second Intermediate Appellate Court
  • 14:7000 APPEALS FROM JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
  • 14:7100 Overview
  • 14:7110 Standards of Review of Administrative Action
  • 14:7111 Administrative Review Standards as Compared to Appellate Standards of Review
  • 14:7112 Nature of the Analysis
  • 14:7200 Standards of Appellate Review
  • 14:7210 No Deference on Appeal from Decision of Reviewing Court
  • 14:7220 Exception: Reviewing Court Acting as a Court of First Instance





  • Table Of Contents Civil Appeals Home
    Donald J. M. Brown, QC General About

    Copyright Canvasback Publishing   Toronto    © 2011 All rights reserved